Proofkeep: a landing page for the Compliance Evidence Collector idea

Find any SOC 2 proof in seconds, even months later

People said the proof exists but nobody knows where, and proving MFA from March meant a manual hunt. The headline promises the opposite: find any proof fast, even months later. It names the exact moment that hurt, so a reader preparing for SOC 2 sees their own problem in the first line.

Words it borrows from real posts:

• “begging eng for screenshots”
• “wrong access review spreadsheet”
• “nobody knew where”
• “internal notes”

1. Navigation: It gives quick jumps to how it works, features, pricing and FAQ, and keeps the early access button in view, so a busy reader can check one thing and act.
2. Hero: It states the promise, names the tools evidence comes from, and shows a sample locker table with date, owner and control. That answers the 'who has the latest evidence?' chaos people described.
3. Problem: It plays back the pains people wrote about, like the MFA hunt, the late screenshot requests, the wrong spreadsheet and the zip with notes. Readers see that the page understands them before it asks for anything.
4. How it works: Three short steps show the path from scattered proof to a checked packet. Stressing read-only access answers a worry a security-minded reader would have.
5. Features: Each feature maps to one complaint: past proof for MFA, owners and dates for unclear evidence, packet checks for wrong files and notes, and one request to engineering instead of a late chase.
6. Who it's for: It says who the page is for and who it is not for. That keeps the test focused on small teams doing their first SOC 2 themselves, which is the group these posts came from.
7. Comparison: It places the idea between big compliance platforms and a free folder plus spreadsheet. Readers can judge the gap the page claims to fill without leaving the page.
8. Pricing: One plan with everything included keeps the choice simple. It tests whether a small team will commit at this price.
9. FAQ: It answers the doubts a careful buyer would raise: storage and access, which tools connect, setup time, what the idea does not do, and later audits.
10. Final call to action: It restates the promise in the readers' own terms, including the late screenshot hunt, and gives one last button for anyone who scrolled to the end.
11. Footer: A one-line blurb repeats what the idea is and who it serves, so the page closes on a clear position.

• Monthly: $149 a month
• Annual: $1,430 a year

A single monthly price at $149 is meant to sit well below big compliance platforms for a small team. The annual plan at $1,430 gives a discount, which the page puts at 20%, for teams sure they will stay through the audit cycle. Two options test both a light commitment and a stronger one.

The button says Get early access. After the click: Proofkeep is almost ready

'Get early access' is honest because Ghostlaunch built this page to test the idea and the product does not exist yet. The click asks only for interest, and the dialog 'Proofkeep is almost ready' says so plainly. Clicks show how many people asking for a fix want it.

Brand colour #2F5D4E, the “classic” font pair, a light theme.

The deep green reads as calm and trustworthy, which suits compliance work and people tired of audit chaos. The classic font pair and light theme look like a careful document, close to the clean packet these teams want to hand to an auditor.