Vettly: a landing page for the Security Check for AI Apps idea

Prove one user can't see another's data before launch

It answers the exact fear in the posts: can one person see another person's data? It promises proof, not a guess, which speaks to people who found that asking the AI only "often finds bugs" and wanted a more precise way. "Before launch" names the moment they got cold feet.

Words it borrows from real posts:

• “Is the login actually secure?”
• “Can one person see another person's data?”
• “before launch”

1. Navigation: It lets a nervous builder jump straight to how it works, what it checks, the price or the FAQ, and keeps a signup button in view.
2. Hero: It states the promise, shows that only a URL is needed, and uses a sample report with pass and fix badges so the visitor can picture the verdict they asked for.
3. Problem: It repeats the questions people asked about login and data access, and the worry about daily changes, so readers see their own doubts named before any pitch.
4. How it works: Three short steps show that someone who has never coded can run the check without setup or security vocabulary.
5. Features: Each feature maps to a fear in the posts: cross-user data, weak logins, fixes they can apply, and changes that break yesterday's work. Sample mockups show the output.
6. Who it's for: It names who this example targets and who it does not, so the test attracts first-time builders about to share a link and filters out teams needing formal audits.
7. Comparison: It answers the obvious question from the posts: why not just ask the AI? It contrasts reading code with testing the live app's behavior.
8. Pricing: It frames two plans around the moment people described: one check before launch, then repeat checks as the app keeps changing.
9. FAQ: It handles the doubts a worried builder would raise: cost, access, user data, breakage, jargon. It is honest that a pass is not total security.
10. Final call to action: It restates the outcome people want, sharing the link without fear, and repeats the main button for readers who scrolled to the end.
11. Footer: It closes with a one-line summary of what the product is meant to be.

• Launch Scan: $29 once
• Monthly Re-check: $19 a month

A one-time $29 scan fits the single moment before launch and a side project with no revenue. The $19 monthly plan matches people who said the AI changes their app every day and want each change checked. The price shows up in the button so the test measures real willingness to pay.

The button says Get the $29 launch scan. After the click: Vettly is almost ready

"Get the $29 launch scan" names the outcome and the price, so a click means real intent, not curiosity. The product does not exist yet. The dialog "Vettly is almost ready" tells the visitor this is an early test, and the FAQ note says nothing is charged before a scan runs.

Brand colour #1F6F54, the “friendly” font pair, a light theme.

A deep green reads as safe and passed, which is the feeling people asking for a fix want before sharing. The friendly font pair keeps a security topic from feeling intimidating to first-time builders. A light theme looks like a clear, readable report.